Judging Sex

Deborah Tuerkheimer

Northwestern University - School of Law

July 26, 2011

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 97, p. 101, 2012

This Article explores the curious jurisprudence of sexual patterns and how it constructs female sexuality. In modern rape law, the “unchaste character inference” expressly prohibited by the rape shield endures. Though the boundaries that circumscribe appropriate sexual conduct have shifted over time, courts persist in making normative judgments about women’s sexuality. Cloaked in the legitimizing rhetoric of sexual patterns, retrograde notions of deviancy are substituting for rational deliberation on the question of consent. As rape shield law enters its fourth decade, it continues to defy reason, both in application and in theory. The proposed evidentiary approach promises to improve judicial decision making in rape cases, while reorienting the law toward the female sexual subject and the contingency of her consent.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 27, 2011 ; Last revised: August 7, 2012

Suggested Citation

Tuerkheimer, Deborah, Judging Sex (July 26, 2011). Cornell Law Review, Vol. 97, p. 101, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1895475

Contact Information

Deborah Tuerkheimer (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,714
Downloads: 246
Download Rank: 89,415

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds