Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1895883
 


 



Wallace Stevens' Philosophical Evasions


Gregory Brazeal


U.S. Army JAG Corps

April 1, 2007

Wallace Stevens Journal Vol. 31, No.1, pp. 27-42, Spring 2007

Abstract:     
How could thought ever benefit from being formed in poetic language rather than philosophical prose? This essay attempts to clarify a single, relatively narrow respect in which poetry can perform philosophical work that prose, as such, cannot: the evasion of philosophical dogmatism through Stevensian qualification. What Helen Vendler in an early essay calls Stevens’ “qualified assertions,” and what Marjorie Perloff calls Stevens’ “ironic modes," are the basic techniques of Wallace Stevens' anti-dogmatic art.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: Wallace Stevens, philosophy, poetry, qualified assertion, anti-dogmatism, Helen Vendler, Marjorie Perloff, G.P. Baker, Simon Critchley, The Ultimate Poem Is Abstract

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 27, 2011 ; Last revised: September 2, 2014

Suggested Citation

Brazeal, Gregory, Wallace Stevens' Philosophical Evasions (April 1, 2007). Wallace Stevens Journal Vol. 31, No.1, pp. 27-42, Spring 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1895883

Contact Information

Gregory Brazeal (Contact Author)
U.S. Army JAG Corps ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 405
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 227,756

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds