Boxed in? Australia's Plain Tobacco Packaging Initiative and International Investment Law
Andrew D. Mitchell
University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School
Sebastian M. Wurzberger
affiliation not provided to SSRN
July 28, 2011
Arbitration International, Vol. 27, 2011
U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 559
This article uses Australia as a case study to identify the issues that may arise in ensuring compliance of plain tobacco packaging measures with international investment law. It explains how the tobacco industry could use investor-state dispute settlement under Australia’s investment protection agreements, as Philip Morris Asia Limited has done in its claim under the Australia-HK bilateral investment treaty. It then considers whether the tobacco industry would satisfy the threshold requirement of having made a relevant investment, before considering whether plain packaging could be considered an expropriation or a breach of the fair and equitable treatment obligation or another investment standard. The article concludes that Australia has strong arguments that plain packaging is consistent with its international investment obligations.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: international investment law, plain packaging, international law, tobacco, intellectual property, trademarks
JEL Classification: K32, K33, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 27, 2011 ; Last revised: October 25, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.485 seconds