|
||||
|
||||
Foreign Ownership of U.S. Safe Assets: Good or Bad?Jack FavilukisLondon School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) Sydney C. LudvigsonNew York University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Stijn Van NieuwerburghNew York University Stern School of Business, Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) July 27, 2011 Abstract: The last 20 years have been marked by a sharp rise in international demand for U.S. reserve assets, or safe stores-of-value. This paper analyzes the welfare consequences of these fluctuations in international capital flows in a two-sector general equilibrium model with uninsurable idiosyncratic and aggregate risks. The model implies that the young benefit from a capital inflow due to lower interest rates, which reduce the costs of home ownership and of borrowing against higher expected future income. Middle-aged savers are hurt because they are crowded out of the safe bond market and exposed to greater systematic risk in equity and housing markets. Although they are partially compensated for this in equilibrium by higher risk premia, they still suffer from lower expected rates of return on their savings. By contrast, retired individuals, who are drawing down assets and who receive social security income that is least sensitive to the current aggregate state, benefit handsomely from the rise in asset values that accompanies a capital inflow. Under the "veil of ignorance," newborns gain from foreign purchases of the safe asset and would be willing to forgo up to 1% of lifetime consumption in order to avoid a large capital outflow.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 60 JEL Classification: G11, G12, E44, E21 working papers seriesDate posted: July 29, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds