|
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
Of Financial Rights of Assisted Reproductive Technology: Non-Marital Children and Back-Up PlansDara E. PurvisUniversity of Illinois College of Law January 30, 2011 Southern California Law Review Postscript, Vol. 83, January 2011 Abstract: Response to Courtney G. Joslin, Protecting Children(?): Marriage, Gender, and Assisted Reproductive Technology, 83 S. CAL. L. REV. 1177 (2010). This short response argues that Joslin’s parentage rule assessing intent at conception cannot be utilized without a clearer definition of conception and that it should be expanded to assess intent at any point before birth.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8 Keywords: Family law Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 31, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds
