Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1899107
 


 



Of Financial Rights of Assisted Reproductive Technology: Non-Marital Children and Back-Up Plans


Dara E. Purvis


Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law

January 30, 2011

Southern California Law Review Postscript, Vol. 83, January 2011

Abstract:     
Response to Courtney G. Joslin, Protecting Children(?): Marriage, Gender, and Assisted Reproductive Technology, 83 S. CAL. L. REV. 1177 (2010).

This short response argues that Joslin’s parentage rule assessing intent at conception cannot be utilized without a clearer definition of conception and that it should be expanded to assess intent at any point before birth.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: Family law


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 31, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Purvis, Dara E., Of Financial Rights of Assisted Reproductive Technology: Non-Marital Children and Back-Up Plans (January 30, 2011). Southern California Law Review Postscript, Vol. 83, January 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1899107

Contact Information

Dara E. Purvis (Contact Author)
Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law ( email )
Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 284
Downloads: 33

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds