Abstract

 


 



Contending Theories of Public Goods Provision: Evidence from Peru


Glenn Wright


University of Colorado at Boulder

2011

APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper

Abstract:     
By ignoring the possibility that many ostensibly “public” goods such as education and public health services can be provided excludably - that is, as club/toll or private goods - comparative scholarship has underestimated the importance of clientelism and particularism as a source of government services. Here, I argue that much government service provision in Peru is a result of the particularistic exchange of political support (by voters) for tangible government services (by elected politicians). Peruvian local governments, because of an unusual institutional structure, is a critical case for the study of particularism. Therefore, I test a newly developed theory of particularism and government service provision against existing theory of public goods provision using quantitative data from approximately 1600 Peruvian municipal governments and qualitative observations from about one year in the field. I find that particularism explains substantial variation unexplained by existing theory.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: clientelism, public goods, club goods, Peru

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 1, 2011 ; Last revised: August 27, 2011

Suggested Citation

Wright, Glenn, Contending Theories of Public Goods Provision: Evidence from Peru (2011). APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1899871

Contact Information

Glenn Wright (Contact Author)
University of Colorado at Boulder ( email )
1070 Edinboro Drive
Boulder, CO 80309
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 156
Downloads: 36

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.422 seconds