Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1900005
 
 

Footnotes (266)



 


 



Graham on the Ground


Cara H. Drinan


Catholic University of America (CUA)

August 1, 2011

87 Wash. L. Rev. 51 (2012)

Abstract:     
In Graham v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to sentence a non-homicide juvenile offender to life in prison without parole. While states need not guarantee release to these juvenile offenders, they cannot foreclose such an outcome at the sentencing phase. Scholars have identified several long-term ramifications of Graham, including its likely influence on juvenile sentencing practices and on retributive justice theory. As yet unexamined, though, are the important and thorny legal questions that Graham raises for state judges and lawmakers in the very short term. To whom does the Graham decision apply? What is the appropriate remedy for those inmates? What affirmative obligations does the Graham decision impose upon the states? This Article endeavors to answer these and other pressing questions that confront judges and legislators today. Part I briefly describes the Graham opinion and surveys what scholars to date have identified as salient aspects of the decision. Part II seeks to provide a blueprint for lower courts and legislatures implementing the Graham decision. Specifically, it argues that: (1) Graham is retroactively applicable to all inmates who received a life-without-parole sentence for a juvenile non-homicide crime; (2) those inmates entitled to relief under Graham require effective representation at their resentencing hearings; (3) judges presiding over resentencing hearings should err in favor of rehabilitation over retribution to comport with the spirit of Graham; and (4) long-term legislative and executive action are necessary in order to make Graham’s promise a reality. Finally, Part III situates Graham in the context of our nation’s ongoing criminal justice failings. While the sentence challenged in Graham ought to be viewed as a symptom of such failings, the Graham decision may offer a window of hope for reform on that same front.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 1, 2011 ; Last revised: June 8, 2012

Suggested Citation

Drinan, Cara H., Graham on the Ground (August 1, 2011). 87 Wash. L. Rev. 51 (2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1900005

Contact Information

Cara Hope Drinan (Contact Author)
Catholic University of America (CUA) ( email )
116 McMahon Hall
Washington, DC 20064
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 552
Downloads: 131
Download Rank: 130,494
Footnotes:  266

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds