|
||||
|
||||
Investigative DeceitKevin C. McMunigalCase Western Reserve University School of Law August 1, 2011 Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 62, p. 1377, 2011 Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-15 Abstract: Is it ever ethical for a lawyer to ask or assist another person to lie on behalf of a client? Despite ethical rules categorically banning both personal and vicarious deceit, prosecutors routinely supervise police officers and informants who use deceit in investigating drug and sex offenses, organized crime, and terrorism. May defense lawyers make use of investigative deceit in criminal investigations? In this Essay, the Author examines this issue, the ethical rules bearing on it, and the recent trend in a number of jurisdictions allowing the use of investigative deceit by the defense. Drawing on his participation in a series of roundtable discussions sponsored by the Criminal Justice Section of the American Bar Association, the Author canvasses the various arguments that are marshaled both for and against allowing criminal defense lawyers to use investigative deceit.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22 Keywords: Investigative Deceit, Legal Ethics, Criminal Defense Attorneys, Lying, ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Legal Ethics (Oregon), Legal Ethics (Wisconsin) JEL Classification: K14 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 1, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.547 seconds