Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903381
 
 

References (31)



 


 



Legal Responsibility Adjudication and the Normative Authority of the Mind Sciences


Nicole A. Vincent


Georgia State University; Delft University of Technology - Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management

August 1, 2011

Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 315-331, 2011

Abstract:     
In the field of ‘neurolaw’, reformists claim that recent scientific discoveries from the mind sciences have serious ramifications for how legal responsibility should be adjudicated, but conservatives deny that this is so. In contrast, I criticise both of these polar opposite positions by arguing that although scientific findings can have often – weighty normative significance, they lack the normative authority with which reformists often imbue them. After explaining why conservatives and reformists are both wrong, I then offer my own moderate suggestions about what views we have reason to endorse. My moderate position reflects the familiar capacitarian idea which underlies much lay, legal, and philosophical thinking about responsibility – namely, that responsibility tracks mental capacity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: responsibility, neurolaw, neuroscience, psychology, normative authority

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 2, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Vincent, Nicole A., Legal Responsibility Adjudication and the Normative Authority of the Mind Sciences (August 1, 2011). Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 315-331, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903381

Contact Information

Nicole A. Vincent (Contact Author)
Georgia State University ( email )
35 Broad Street
Atlanta, GA 30303-3083
United States
HOME PAGE: http://nicolevincent.net
Delft University of Technology - Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management ( email )
P.O. Box 5015
2600 GB Delft
Netherlands
+31654363692 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://nicolevincent.net/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,079
Downloads: 178
Download Rank: 100,813
References:  31
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds