Anti-Bribery Legislation in the United States and United Kingdom: A Comparative Analysis of Scope and Sentencing
Northern District of Ohio; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft; Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
August 4, 2011
Missouri Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 415-453, 2011
Lawmakers and prosecutors continue to take aim at a major subset of global corruption - corporate bribery of foreign government officials. Specifically, while the enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the United States has risen to new records, the United Kingdom has revolutionized its anti-bribery law following global criticism of its previously relaxed legal regime. Both U.S. and U.K. anti-bribery laws, furthermore, apply extraterritorially and have the capability to entangle even the largest multinational companies in their legal frameworks. These all-encompassing frameworks hold significant consequences for both corporations and their employees, but the increasing power of anti-bribery law raises important questions regarding the proper scope of legislation on the subject, as well as the sentencing approaches to these crimes.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 3, 2011 ; Last revised: June 28, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds