Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1904390
 
 

Footnotes (179)



 


 



Fraud on the Market: Analysis of the Efficiency of the Corporate Bond Market


Michael L. Hartzmark


Navigant Consulting, Inc.

Cindy A. Schipani


University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business

H. Nejat Seyhun


University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business

July 1, 2011

Columbia Business Law Review, 2011
Ross School of Business Paper No. 1158

Abstract:     
The efficiency of the corporate bond market is not well understood. Although many of the factors used to analyze stock market efficiency translate with some adjustments to corporate bond markets, the cause-effect factor is not intuitive and can be a source of significant confusion.

In this manuscript we analyze bond market efficiency in the context of a recent court decision. In recent litigation concerning allegations of securities fraud perpetrated by the American International Group (AIG), the federal district court for the Southern District of New York declined to certify a class of bondholders, citing lack of common questions of law or fact. The decision turned on an empirical analysis of whether certain AIG bonds traded in an open, developed and efficient market. If the market for these bonds had been found efficient, there would have been grounds to certify the bondholders as a class.

Ironically, the court found insufficient empirical evidence to hold that the $1.71 billion in AIG bonds, issued by the world’s largest insurance company, traded in efficient markets. Unfortunately, the AIG court missed salient differences between the stock and bond markets in reaching its conclusion. Our manuscript describes the analysis missed by the court and supports a contrary result.

Part I provides an overview of the law as it has developed regarding certification of class actions and the elements of a claim of fraud on the market as relevant to the lead plaintiffs’ claims of violations of the securities laws. Part II introduces the required empirical analysis and benchmarks to evaluate a claim of fraud on the market. Part III continues with a theoretical discussion of the distinctions missing in the AIG analysis between bonds and stocks relevant to determining whether the bond market should be afforded the fraud on the market presumption. Part IV builds on this with a discussion of our alternate empirical analyses. Concluding remarks follow.

The AIG decision has serious implications not only for the corporate bond market but also for public policy. Private securities fraud class actions are an important mechanism for deterring fraud and promoting confidence in the securities markets. When market efficiency is important for determining certification of a class of security holders, it is critical that courts carefully consider how different markets operate.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: fraud on the market, corporate bond market, class action, market efficiency, corporate governance

JEL Classification: G32, G39, G34, K22, K00, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 3, 2011 ; Last revised: August 11, 2011

Suggested Citation

Hartzmark, Michael L. and Schipani, Cindy A. and Seyhun, H. Nejat, Fraud on the Market: Analysis of the Efficiency of the Corporate Bond Market (July 1, 2011). Columbia Business Law Review, 2011; Ross School of Business Paper No. 1158. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1904390

Contact Information

Michael L. Hartzmark
Navigant Consulting, Inc. ( email )
30 S. Wacker,
Suite 3400
Chicago, IL 60604
United States
Cindy A. Schipani (Contact Author)
University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business ( email )
701 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI MI 48109
United States
313-763-2257 (Phone)
313-764-2557 (Fax)
H. Nejat Seyhun
University of Michigan, Stephen M. Ross School of Business ( email )
701 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI MI 48109
United States
734-763-5463 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,815
Downloads: 280
Download Rank: 61,824
Footnotes:  179

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds