The Supreme Court Disposes of a Nuisance Suit: American Electric Power v. Connecticut
Jonathan H. Adler
Case Western Reserve University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
August 3, 2011
Cato Supreme Court Review, p. 295, 2010-2011
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-17
In American Electric Power v. Connecticut the Supreme Court confronted climate change litigation for the second time. Whereas Massachusetts v. EPA was a closely divided court decision with dramatic and far-reaching legal and policy implications, AEP was a narrow, unanimous opinion that hewed closely to well-settled precedent. In AEP the Court side-stepped difficult jurisdictional questions and rejected an ambitious effort to turn the federal common law of nuisance into a judicially administered environmental regulatory regime. While not erecting any new barriers to future climate suits, the Court’s opinion raised cautions about trying to make climate change policy through the judiciary. That climate change is a serious concern does not mean it is a matter for the courts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 25
Keywords: American Electric Power v. Connecticut, Massachusetts v. EPA, Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company, Public Nuisance, Interstate Pollution, Global Warming, Climate Change, Climate Litigation, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Clean Air Act, Environmental Protection Agency
JEL Classification: K23, K32
Date posted: August 4, 2011 ; Last revised: July 1, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.829 seconds