Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1905032
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Standing, Spending, and Separation: How the No-Establishment Rule Does (and Does Not) Protect Conscience


Richard W. Garnett


Notre Dame Law School

May 4, 2009

Villanova Law Review, Vol. 54, p. 655, 2009
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 11-28

Abstract:     
The First Amendment’s “Establishment Clause” is widely thought to protect “conscience.” Does it? If so, how? It is proposed in this paper that the no-establishment rule does indeed promote and protect religious liberty, and does safeguard conscience, but not (or, at least, not only) in the way most people think it does, namely, by sparing those who object from the asserted injury to their conscience caused by public funding of religious activity.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation - a case in which the Justices limited taxpayer standing to bring Establishment Clause claims - reminds us of the importance in our constitutional law and tradition of structural devices that preserve individual liberty and, in so doing, helps to illuminate the real relationship between nonestablishment and the liberty of conscience: Nonestablishment and church-state separation protect conscience by committing us to the idea that there are, and ought to be, multiple, rival authorities. Protecting and respecting the freedom of conscience requires protecting and respecting the competing associations, institutions, and authorities that both clear out the space in which consciences are formed and engage in the formation of consciences. A community that cherishes the freedom of conscience will allow non-state formers-of-conscience to flourish, will acknowledge their appropriate independence, and will not aspire to remake them in its own image.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Establishment Clause, First Amendment, Religious Freedom, Religious Liberty, Standing, James Madison, Martha Nussbaum, Conscience, Supreme Court, John Courtney Murray

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K39

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 5, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Garnett, Richard W., Standing, Spending, and Separation: How the No-Establishment Rule Does (and Does Not) Protect Conscience (May 4, 2009). Villanova Law Review, Vol. 54, p. 655, 2009; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 11-28. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1905032

Contact Information

Richard W. Garnett (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
Room 327
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
574-631-6981 (Phone)
574-631-4197 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 396
Downloads: 63
Download Rank: 210,759
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.437 seconds