Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1905159
 


 



Receiverships in the Prison Litigation Context: Factors Necessary for an Effective Judicial Remedy of Last Resort


Liat Weingart


Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal, Vol. 9, p. 193, 2010

Abstract:     
This article addresses the most invasive of judicial equitable remedies in institutional reform litigation: the receivership. Unlike other equitable remedies, the receivership completely displaces the leadership of an executive agency in order to force it to comply with its constitutional obligations to the plaintiffs. This article is a comparative analysis of three receiverships in the prison litigation context. It analyzes various aspects of each receivership, including the circumstances that led to it, the mandate of the receiver, the experience of the receivership, and the outcome of the receivership in relation to the Court’s stated goals. The article concludes with structural recommendations that courts may institute in order to implement a receivership effectively.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 4, 2011 ; Last revised: August 23, 2011

Suggested Citation

Weingart, Liat, Receiverships in the Prison Litigation Context: Factors Necessary for an Effective Judicial Remedy of Last Resort. Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal, Vol. 9, p. 193, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1905159

Contact Information

Liat Weingart (Contact Author)
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 538
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 167,061

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.578 seconds