Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1905635
 


 



Detecting Error, Learning from Our Mistakes, and the Appellate Asymmetry


Larry Laudan


University of Texas School of Law

August 5, 2011

U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 201

Abstract:     
This paper investigates the epistemic obstacles posed by a legal system that prevents reversal of acquittals. Because such prevention disincentivizes appeals of non-guilty verdicts by prosecutors, false acquittals are virtually impossible to identify. Apart from entailing that such errors cannot be corrected (since they are not detected), this policy has a more egregious consequence; to wit, that appellate courts have little or no opportunity to learn what kinds of flaws lead to false acquittals. Without such knowledge, the courts are in no position to make or to recommend the sorts of changes that would otherwise allow the system to reform itself by learning from its mistakes. Finally, the appellate asymmetry arguably creates a situation in which rulings from lower court judges are much more likely to favor the defendant than the prosecution. All these problems could be resolved if double jeopardy protection were seriously rethought.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 6, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Laudan, Larry, Detecting Error, Learning from Our Mistakes, and the Appellate Asymmetry (August 5, 2011). U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 201. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1905635 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1905635

Contact Information

Larry Laudan (Contact Author)
University of Texas School of Law
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 302
Downloads: 55
Download Rank: 213,814

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 1.000 seconds