Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1905695
 


 



Wedlocked


Mary Patricia Byrn


William Mitchell College of Law

Morgan Holcomb


Hamline University - School of Law

August 1, 2011

University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 67, p. 1, 2012
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-04

Abstract:     
For as long as marriage has existed in the United States, divorce has been its necessary opposite. So strong is the need for divorce that the Supreme Court has suggested it is a fundamental right, and every state in the country allows access to no-fault divorce. For opposite-sex couples, legally ending their marriage is possible as a matter of right. For married same-sex couples, however, state DoMAs (Defense of Marriage Acts) have been a stumbling block – preventing access to divorce in some states. Same-sex couples in numerous states are being told by attorneys and judges that they cannot terminate their legal marriage. In a word, these couples are wedlocked.

This article proceeds in three parts. Part I will address the question: “Who needs divorce?” The answer: Everyone who is in a legal marriage in which they no longer wish to remain a party. Part I of this article discusses the importance of divorce to married couples who no longer share their lives, and sets out the array of intractable issues that arise when a couple – whether opposite-sex or same-sex – is unable to end a marriage. Part II addresses the question: “Do courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over same-sex divorce?” The answer: Yes. In the vast majority of states, nothing has stripped state courts of general jurisdiction of the power to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over a same-sex divorce. Part III addresses the question: “Can a court grant a same-sex divorce?” The answer: Yes. Again, the vast majority of state DoMAs neither explicitly nor implicitly prevents a court from granting a divorce to same-sex couples. Part IV takes on the question: “How can a same-sex couple get a divorce?” This Part explains how a court can grant a same-sex divorce by applying the residency state’s divorce statute, the divorce statute of the marrying state, or by granting equitable relief. Finally, Part V asks the question: “Are courts required to grant same-sex divorce?” The answer: Yes. Part V asserts that denying same-sex couples access to divorce violates due process and equal protection. These constitutional provisions require states to provide access to divorce to same-sex couples to prevent them from remaining wedlocked.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: same-sex marriage, divorce, separation, dissolution, DOMA, Defense of Marriage Act, D.O.M.A., fundamental rights

JEL Classification: J12, K00

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 6, 2011 ; Last revised: March 5, 2013

Suggested Citation

Byrn, Mary Patricia and Holcomb, Morgan, Wedlocked (August 1, 2011). University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 67, p. 1, 2012; William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1905695

Contact Information

Mary Patricia Byrn (Contact Author)
William Mitchell College of Law ( email )
875 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105
United States
651-290-6478 (Phone)
Morgan Holcomb
Hamline University - School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 491
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 173,362

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.219 seconds