Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1906584
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



The Independent Invention Defence in a Cournot Duopoly Model


Elisabetta Ottoz


University of Turin - Department of Economics

Franco Cugno


University of Turin

August 8, 2011

Economics Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 1−7

Abstract:     
Maurer and Scotchmer (2002) pointed out that patents may be inferior to other forms of intellectual property in that the independent invention is not a defence to infringement. The authors’ analysis refers to situations in which there is an unlimited number of potential entrants by independent duplication. If independent invention were a defence to infringement, the continual threat of entry would induce the patent−holder to license its technology on terms that commit to a lower output price, and this is where the social benefit lies. In this note we extend the analysis to the case of a single potential entrant when the law impose certain restrictions on the contracts that patent holders and licensees can subscribe. We show that these legal restrictions may be partial substitutes for the continual threat of entry by as yet unidentified subjects.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 8, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Ottoz, Elisabetta and Cugno, Franco, The Independent Invention Defence in a Cournot Duopoly Model (August 8, 2011). Economics Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 1−7. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1906584

Contact Information

Elisabetta Ottoz
University of Turin - Department of Economics ( email )
Via Po, 53
Torino, 10124
Italy
+390116702739 (Phone)
+390116702762 (Fax)
Franco Cugno (Contact Author)
University of Turin ( email )
Via Po 53
Torino, Turin - Piedmont 10100
Italy
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 156
Downloads: 19
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds