Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1906740
 


 



Upsides of the American Trial's 'Anticonfluential' Nature: Notes on Richard K. Sherwin, David Foster Wallace, and James O. Incandenza


Michael S. Pardo


University of Alabama School of Law

August 8, 2011

IMAGINING LEGALITY: WHERE LAW MEETS POPULAR CULTURE, Austin Sarat, ed., 2011
U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1906740

Abstract:     
This essay is an invited response to Richard K. Sherwin’s article, “Law’s Screen Life.” Although legal topics and tropes are commonplace in popular culture, and their prevalence is the source of much commentary, less well known is whether and how popular culture affects law. The latter is the complex question that Sherwin takes up in his provocative article, where he explores the effects on law when it adopts the “expressive forms” of the “visual mass media.” He tells a cautionary tale about a series of negative epistemic and moral consequences for law from this interaction.

This essay picks up Sherwin’s cautionary tale from the opposite direction and examines how different forms of legal decision-making may respond to the concerns he discusses, with a particular focus on factual decision-making at trial. I first discuss a number of epistemological aspects underlying Sherwin’s account in order to clarify, challenge, and extend some of the analysis. I next examine the narratives of the visual mass media and a particular response to these narratives in contemporary fiction. Here I discuss the work of David Foster Wallace and his novel Infinite Jest. I argue that, in some ways surprisingly similar to Wallace’s novel, the American trial structures narratives in ways that respond to the problematic narrative forms of the visual mass media at the heart of Sherwin’s cautionary tale and that the trial often provides a better forum for counteracting these problems than other types of legal decision-making.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Richard Sherwin, visual jurisprudence, sexual predators, fMRI, narrative, epistemology, morality, juries, story model, coherence, David Foster Wallace, Infinite Jest

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 8, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Pardo, Michael S., Upsides of the American Trial's 'Anticonfluential' Nature: Notes on Richard K. Sherwin, David Foster Wallace, and James O. Incandenza (August 8, 2011). IMAGINING LEGALITY: WHERE LAW MEETS POPULAR CULTURE, Austin Sarat, ed., 2011; U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1906740. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1906740

Contact Information

Michael S. Pardo (Contact Author)
University of Alabama School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 897
Downloads: 193
Download Rank: 93,587

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds