First Things About Secondary Rights
Brad W. Holland
affiliation not provided to SSRN
June 15, 2006
Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2006
Until recently, most freelance illustrators and photographers licensed their work exclusively through direct relationships with their clients. Clients commissioned a work for specific uses in their publications and paid a specific price to the creator. The rights negotiated for this usage were called primary rights; all other rights were secondary and, in theory, these were retained by the artist or photographer. For years, secondary rights were reckoned to have little or no commercial value. Yet, over the last three decades, major trends have altered this traditional licensing model and have made secondary rights a contested prize for publishers, commercial archives and creators alike.
The first of these trends is the growing demand from publishers that illustrators surrender all their rights as a condition of accepting assignments. The second is the spread of large, well-capitalized stock “agencies,” which use inventories of discounted back-work to compete with artists for their primary markets. Both of these trends preceded the internet, but online technologies have quickened the pace of change and have amplified their effects. This Article will largely address how these trends and the contest for secondary rights is re-shaping the field of visual arts. Part I will summarize the effects of change on freelance artists. Part II will outline the efforts by artists to create a system of collective rights management to protect their rights.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: visual art secondary rights, collective rights management, copyright, exclusive rights, reprographic rights
JEL Classification: O34, L82, D45, D79
Date posted: August 13, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds