Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1909304
 
 

Footnotes (241)



 


 



Avoiding Normative Canons in the Review of Administrative Interpretations of the Law: A Brand X Doctrine of Constitutional Avoidance


Christopher J. Walker


Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

Winter 2012

Administrative Law Review, Vol. 64, pp. 139-190, 2012

Abstract:     
This Article explores the conflicting commands of modern constitutional avoidance (courts must construe ambiguous statutes not only to adopt a constitutional construction but to avoid constructions that raise constitutional questions) and Chevron deference (courts must defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute it administers). While courts and commentators have suggested that constitutional avoidance trumps Chevron deference (at either step one or two), this Article advocates that modern avoidance should play no role in the review of administrative interpretations of law. Once Congress has empowered an agency to interpret an ambiguous statutory provision, a court cannot simply invalidate the agency’s interpretation and replace it with one the court believes better avoids constitutional questions.

Instead, if an agency’s reasonable interpretation raises constitutional questions, a court must determine whether the interpretation is indeed unconstitutional and thus an impermissible interpretation at Chevron step two. This approach constitutes a return to the classical doctrine of constitutional avoidance, and it finds support in the Supreme Court’s decision in National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Services. As the Article illustrates in a variety of administrative contexts, this Brand X doctrine of constitutional avoidance is necessary to preserve a proper separation of powers between the courts, the Executive, and Congress. It is also justified under Dean Edward Rubin’s network theory of administrative law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: constitutional avoidance, Chevron, administrative law, separation of powers, Brand X

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 15, 2011 ; Last revised: March 4, 2014

Suggested Citation

Walker, Christopher J., Avoiding Normative Canons in the Review of Administrative Interpretations of the Law: A Brand X Doctrine of Constitutional Avoidance (Winter 2012). Administrative Law Review, Vol. 64, pp. 139-190, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1909304 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1909304

Contact Information

Christopher Jay Walker (Contact Author)
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )
55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
614-292-2631 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/faculty/professor/christopher-j-walker/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 895
Downloads: 291
Download Rank: 58,226
Footnotes:  241
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Information for Submitting Articles to Law Reviews & Journals
By Allen Rostron and Nancy Levit

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.484 seconds