|
||||
|
||||
The Design and Effects of a Long-Term Performance PlanByung Hyun ChoiLG Economic Research Institute Simon Jonghwan KimUniversity of Southern California - Leventhal School of Accounting Kyung Tae LeeSchool of Business, Yonsei University Kenneth A. MerchantUniversity of Southern California - Leventhal School of Accounting August 15, 2011 AAA 2012 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper Abstract: We use data obtained from a large Korean conglomerate to explore the design and effects of a long-term performance plan (LTPP) and the short-term incentive plan (STIP) with which it is used. We found that the adoption of the LTTP did appear to lengthen managers’ decision making horizons, as the adoption of the plan was associated with subsequently larger capital, R&D and marketing investments. The payouts from the LTTP were significantly larger than those for the STIP. Most business units achieved their performance targets, but LTIP achievement levels were higher than those for the STIP because the financial targets were more achievable than those for the “key performance indicators” included in the STIP. Most of the contextual factors studied did not have significant effects on either the design or effects of the LTPP. However, larger business units tended to have higher performance and higher bonus payout multiples.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31 Keywords: long-term incentives, bonuses, performance targets, performance evaluations, key performance indicators, uncertainty working papers seriesDate posted: August 16, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.047 seconds