A Road Map for Challenging Voter Restriction Laws after Crawford
Steven D. Schwinn
John Marshall Law School (Chicago)
August 16, 2011
Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty Law & Policy, Vol. 43, p. 49, May-June 2009
The Supreme Court in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board rejected a facial challenge under the Equal Protection Clause to Indiana’s voter-ID law. But despite upholding the law, the Crawford opinions together set out a clear roadmap for challenging any “evenhanded restrictions” on the right to vote. This short piece examines that roadmap.
I start by giving a bit of background on the Indiana law and describing the law’s operation. Next I mine two key opinions in Crawford for clues to a successful challenge of voter-ID laws. Finally, I argue that Crawford gives us three imperatives for successful challenges, and I offer some thoughts on each.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: Vote, Voter ID, Crawford, Equal Protection, Supreme CourtAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 17, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.609 seconds