|
||||
|
||||
A Road Map for Challenging Voter Restriction Laws after CrawfordSteven D. SchwinnJohn Marshall Law School (Chicago) August 16, 2011 Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty Law & Policy, Vol. 43, p. 49, May-June 2009 Abstract: The Supreme Court in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board rejected a facial challenge under the Equal Protection Clause to Indiana’s voter-ID law. But despite upholding the law, the Crawford opinions together set out a clear roadmap for challenging any “evenhanded restrictions” on the right to vote. This short piece examines that roadmap. I start by giving a bit of background on the Indiana law and describing the law’s operation. Next I mine two key opinions in Crawford for clues to a successful challenge of voter-ID laws. Finally, I argue that Crawford gives us three imperatives for successful challenges, and I offer some thoughts on each.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10 Keywords: Vote, Voter ID, Crawford, Equal Protection, Supreme Court Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 17, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.360 seconds