Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1910901
 


 



A Road Map for Challenging Voter Restriction Laws after Crawford


Steven D. Schwinn


John Marshall Law School (Chicago)

August 16, 2011

Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty Law & Policy, Vol. 43, p. 49, May-June 2009

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board rejected a facial challenge under the Equal Protection Clause to Indiana’s voter-ID law. But despite upholding the law, the Crawford opinions together set out a clear roadmap for challenging any “evenhanded restrictions” on the right to vote. This short piece examines that roadmap.

I start by giving a bit of background on the Indiana law and describing the law’s operation. Next I mine two key opinions in Crawford for clues to a successful challenge of voter-ID laws. Finally, I argue that Crawford gives us three imperatives for successful challenges, and I offer some thoughts on each.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Vote, Voter ID, Crawford, Equal Protection, Supreme Court

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 17, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Schwinn, Steven D., A Road Map for Challenging Voter Restriction Laws after Crawford (August 16, 2011). Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty Law & Policy, Vol. 43, p. 49, May-June 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1910901

Contact Information

Steven D. Schwinn (Contact Author)
John Marshall Law School (Chicago) ( email )
315 South Plymouth Court
Chicago, IL 60604
United States
312.386.2865 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 213
Downloads: 38

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.609 seconds