Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1911423
 
 

Footnotes (103)



 


 



Lawyers, Context, and Legitimacy: A New Theory of Legal Ethics


Alexander A. Guerrero


University of Pennsylvania - Department of Philosophy; University of Pennsylvania - Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy

September 17, 2011

Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Forthcoming
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-65

Abstract:     
Even good lawyers get a bad rap. One explanation for this is that the professional rules governing lawyers permit and even require behavior that strikes many as immoral. The standard accounts of legal ethics that seek to defend these professional rules do little to dispel this air of immorality. The revisionary accounts of legal ethics that criticize the professional rules inject a hearty dose of morality, but at the cost of leaving lawyers unrecognizable as lawyers. This article suggests that the problem with both the professional rules and the extant accounts of legal ethics is that they treat the role of lawyer as largely uniform, whereas lawyers actually serve several importantly different roles in different contexts. The central insight of the article is that legal ethics must be fundamentally context-sensitive: what lawyers are morally permitted or required to do depends on the background context in which they are working. Additionally, by taking context into account, this article is the first to present a theory of legal ethics as appropriately shaped and constrained by normative political philosophy and norms of political legitimacy.

Specifically, the article argues that people act as lawyers in three different contexts: State v. Individual (situations in which the State seeks to apply some general law to a particular individual), Individual v. Individual (situations in which private individuals are engaged in a dispute), and Individual v. State (situations in which individuals object to State conduct on constitutional or other grounds unrelated to the question of whether a general law applies to their particular case); that the value of lawyers, qua lawyers, stems from a different source in each of these contexts; and that a theory of legal ethics must take into account both of these first two claims. This article develops one such theory - the Multi-Context View. To demonstrate how the theory applies in practice, the article applies the Multi-Context View to two significant issues in legal ethics: the ethical issues involved in deciding whether to represent a client and the moral permissibility of the use of tactical delay.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: Legal Ethics, Political Legitimacy, Political Philosophy, Professional Responsibility

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 18, 2011 ; Last revised: October 10, 2011

Suggested Citation

Guerrero, Alexander A., Lawyers, Context, and Legitimacy: A New Theory of Legal Ethics (September 17, 2011). Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Forthcoming; NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-65. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1911423

Contact Information

Alexander A. Guerrero (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania - Department of Philosophy ( email )
433 Cohen Hall
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
University of Pennsylvania - Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy ( email )
3401 Market Street
Suite 320
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 861
Downloads: 202
Download Rank: 83,354
Footnotes:  103

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.469 seconds