|
||||
|
||||
Why Does Bad News Increase Volatility and Decrease Leverage?Ana FostelGeorge Washington University John GeanakoplosYale University - Cowles Foundation August 18, 2011 Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1762RR Abstract: A recent literature shows how an increase in volatility reduces leverage. However, in order to explain pro-cyclical leverage it assumes that bad news increases volatility, that is, it assumes an inverse relationship between first and second moments of asset returns. This paper suggests a reason why bad news is more often than not associated with higher future volatility. We show that, in a model with endogenous leverage and heterogeneous beliefs, agents have the incentive to invest mostly in technologies that become more volatile in bad times. Agents choose these technologies because they can be leveraged more during normal times. Together with the existing literature this explains pro-cyclical leverage. The result also gives a rationale to the pattern of volatility smiles observed in stock options since 1987. Finally, the paper presents for the first time a dynamic model in which an asset is endogenously traded simultaneously at different margin requirements in equilibrium.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48 Keywords: Collateral, Endogenous leverage, VaR, Volatility, Volatility smile JEL Classification: D52, D53, E44, G01, G11, G12 working papers seriesDate posted: August 19, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds