Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1913565
 


 



The End of Preclearance As We Knew It: How the Supreme Court Transformed Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act


Peyton McCrary


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Christopher B. Seaman


Washington and Lee University School of Law

Richard Valelly


Swarthmore College

2006

Michigan Journal of Race & Law, Vol. 11, p. 275, 2006

Abstract:     
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires certain jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination to obtain “preclearance” of proposed electoral changes from the United States Department of Justice or a three-judge panel in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. This provision, which is set to expire in August 2007, has successfully reduced racial and ethnic discrimination in voting.

The United States Supreme Court determined in a 5-4 decision, Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board, 528 U.S. 230 (2000), that Section 5's prohibition on the enforcement of electoral changes which have a discriminatory purpose does not apply to electoral changes that were not intended to “retrogress,” or make worse, the position of minority voters. This interpretation upset a long-standing consensus among executive, legislative, and judicial actors that Section 5 prohibited all changes enacted with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose, not just those which made minority voters worse off. This Article explains how the Bossier majority dramatically transformed Section 5 and demonstrates, through an empirical analysis of the Justice Department's Section 5 objection letters, how it significantly weakened the statute's ability to protect minority voting rights. It concludes by arguing that Congress should amend Section 5 in 2007 to supercede the Bossier decision.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 21, 2011  

Suggested Citation

McCrary, Peyton and Seaman, Christopher B. and Valelly, Richard, The End of Preclearance As We Knew It: How the Supreme Court Transformed Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (2006). Michigan Journal of Race & Law, Vol. 11, p. 275, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1913565

Contact Information

Peyton McCrary
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Christopher B. Seaman (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University School of Law ( email )
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
540-458-8520 (Phone)

Richard Valelly
Swarthmore College ( email )
Swarthmore, PA 19081
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 876
Downloads: 71
Download Rank: 195,749

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds