Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1914624
 
 

Footnotes (337)



 


 



Recalibrating Constitutional Innocence Protection


Robert J. Smith


University of North Carolina School of Law

September 3, 2011

Washington Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This Article examines the constitutional nature of the right of a prisoner to receive post-conviction relief based solely on the claim that he or she is innocent. Part I explores innocence protection as an animating value of constitutional criminal procedure (Part I.A) and describes how developments in the way that crimes are investigated, proved, and reexamined have dislodged the trial from its place at the center of the constitutional criminal procedure universe (Part I.B). Part II explores how realigning the importance of innocence protection with the practical realities of our criminal justice system would impact the regulation of post-conviction procedures. It also is divided into two sections. Part II.A provides an overview of how the U.S. Supreme Court has treated innocence claims to date. First, it considers gateway innocence claims — those in which the prisoner asserts that new evidence of his factual innocence should permit substantive review of an otherwise defaulted claim that he received a constitutionally deficient trial. It also considers freestanding innocence claims — those in which a prisoner asserts that new evidence of his factual innocence warrants relief despite the fact that the conviction stemmed from a constitutionally sound trial. Part II.B articulates a three-tiered framework — conviction relief, execution relief, gateway innocence — for adjudicating such claims.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 20, 2011 ; Last revised: April 24, 2012

Suggested Citation

Smith, Robert J., Recalibrating Constitutional Innocence Protection (September 3, 2011). Washington Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1914624

Contact Information

Robert J. Smith (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,234
Downloads: 151
Download Rank: 117,288
Footnotes:  337

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.282 seconds