Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1916303
 


 



Baffled by Inactivity: The Individual Mandate and the Commerce Power


John T. Valauri


Northern Kentucky University - Salmon P. Chase College of Law

August 24, 2011


Abstract:     
Is there a way to analyze and evaluate the unprecedented individual mandate, consistent with the text of the Constitution and (at least post-1937) relevant Supreme Court decisions, without relying on the novel activity/inactivity distinction advanced by its opponents (to the bafflement of many courts and commentators)? This article argues that there is. It presents a brief against the mandate based upon the original public meaning and doctrinal exposition of words and phrases such as “commerce,” “regulate,” “necessary and proper,” and even “among,” which are in the Constitution and the cases. In doing this, it resists expansive readings of these terms which would give Congress virtually unlimited power in favor of an understanding more consistent with the principles of limited government and enumerated powers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: Constitution, commerce, necessary and proper, individual mandate, original public meaning

JEL Classification: K10, K19

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 25, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Valauri, John T., Baffled by Inactivity: The Individual Mandate and the Commerce Power (August 24, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1916303 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1916303

Contact Information

John T. Valauri (Contact Author)
Northern Kentucky University - Salmon P. Chase College of Law ( email )
Nunn Hall
Highland Heights, KY 41099
United States
859-572-5387 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 322
Downloads: 76
Download Rank: 189,997

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds