Abstract

 
 

References (52)



 


 



Disjointed Innovation: The Political Economy of Digitally Mediated Institutional Reform


Jane E. Fountain


University of Massachusetts at Amherst - Department of Political Science

August 24, 2011


Abstract:     
Current attention to social media and governance has focused on the enactment of networked communication and information use by and for governance with particular attention to the role of civil society. This paper argues that such a focus, while illuminating a possibly utopian perspective on political participation, often obscures even recent government reforms, existing institutional arrangements, and the myriad processes by which knowledge is translated to action in political settings. Drawing from and extending core perspectives within historical institutionalism, the paper examines three streams of theory and research: temporal models, coordination models, and the political effects of public policies where policies themselves may be conceptualized as institutions. Illustrations are drawn from American and European politics and used to ground as well as to probe models. The objective of the paper is a conceptualization that rebalances attention between agency and structure and that simultaneously considers the political past as well as the future.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: institutions, institutional change, networked governance, e-government, public management, public administration

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 26, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Fountain, Jane E., Disjointed Innovation: The Political Economy of Digitally Mediated Institutional Reform (August 24, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1916392 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1916392

Contact Information

Jane E. Fountain (Contact Author)
University of Massachusetts at Amherst - Department of Political Science ( email )
Amherst, MA 01003
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 229
Downloads: 33
References:  52
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds