Public Oversight and Audit Quality: Evidence from Public Oversight of Audit Firms in the Netherlands
Martijn Van Opijnen
Maastricht Accounting and Auditing Research and Education Center (MARC)
Katrien Van de Poel
University of Antwerp
Maastricht University - Department of Accounting & Information Management, MARC (Maastricht Accounting, Auditing & Information Management Research Center)
August 25, 2011
Using public and proprietary data of the Dutch public oversight body, we study the trade-off suggested by DeFond (2010) of expertise for independence associated with the shift from a peer review system to independent public oversight of audit firms. Specifically, we investigate the association between the audit firms’ inspection and peer review outcomes, and the audit clients’ accruals quality. Our results show that companies audited by an audit firm with a positive inspection outcome have lower abnormal accruals than companies audited by an audit firm with a negative inspection outcome. We find no significant association between the peer review outcomes for audit firms with public interest entities and the audit clients’ abnormal accruals. Furthermore, we find that the types of weaknesses identified by the public oversight body that are most able to discriminate audit quality are related to the design of the audit firm’s quality control system and independence. Overall, our study contributes to the emerging literature on the effectiveness of oversight of audit firms, and is one of the first that relates to a non-US setting.
working papers series
Date posted: August 25, 2011 ; Last revised: August 29, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds