The Elusive Goal of Impartiality
Debra Lyn Bassett
Southwestern Law School
University of California, Davis - School of Law
August 29, 2011
Iowa Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1, 2011
Southwestern Law School Working Paper No. 1131
Over the past ten years, the topic of judicial recusal has received increased attention in virtually every quarter – in the media, in the legal commentary, and even in Congress. The reason for this surge in interest is not due to recent changes in the applicable recusal standards or enhanced investigative reporting, but rather largely appears to be the result of inadequate attention to – or perhaps in some cases, arrogance or callous disregard for – the recusal standards, exacerbated by procedural deficiencies that prevent the recusal rules from being fully effective. This Article seeks to identify the flaws with the current approach to judicial recusal, and then offers a four-step proposal for restoring faith in the judiciary.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: judicial recusal, judicial disqualification, legal ethics
Date posted: August 30, 2011 ; Last revised: May 3, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.828 seconds