Footnotes (167)



The Elusive Goal of Impartiality

Debra Lyn Bassett

Southwestern Law School

Rex Perschbacher

University of California, Davis - School of Law

August 29, 2011

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1, 2011
Southwestern Law School Working Paper No. 1131

Over the past ten years, the topic of judicial recusal has received increased attention in virtually every quarter – in the media, in the legal commentary, and even in Congress. The reason for this surge in interest is not due to recent changes in the applicable recusal standards or enhanced investigative reporting, but rather largely appears to be the result of inadequate attention to – or perhaps in some cases, arrogance or callous disregard for – the recusal standards, exacerbated by procedural deficiencies that prevent the recusal rules from being fully effective. This Article seeks to identify the flaws with the current approach to judicial recusal, and then offers a four-step proposal for restoring faith in the judiciary.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: judicial recusal, judicial disqualification, legal ethics

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 30, 2011 ; Last revised: May 3, 2015

Suggested Citation

Bassett, Debra Lyn and Perschbacher, Rex, The Elusive Goal of Impartiality (August 29, 2011). Southwestern Law School Working Paper No. 1131. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1919252

Contact Information

Debra Lyn Bassett (Contact Author)
Southwestern Law School ( email )
3050 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
United States
213-738-6792 (Phone)
Rex Perschbacher
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 453
Downloads: 50
Footnotes:  167

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds