|
||||
|
||||
Board Diversity and Proxy DisclosureThomas Lee HazenUniversity of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law Lissa L. BroomeUniversity of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law July 30, 2012 University of Dayton Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 39, 2012 UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1920442 Abstract: In Part I, this Article describes some of the different approaches to the lack of representation of women and minorities on corporate boards. Part II explores two aspects of proxy statement regulation -- shareholder proposals related to corporate diversity and the recent amendments to the proxy regulations which require that companies disclose how they consider diversity in nominating board members. Part III presents the results of our analysis of the proxy statements of Fortune 100 companies in the proxy year immediately preceding the effective date of the new proxy disclosure rule and in the year following the rule’s effective date to catalog the initial effects of the rule on how companies discussed diversity in nominating board members.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 37 Keywords: board of directors, corporations, corporate governance, diversity, proxy disclsoures, securities regulation JEL Classification: J7, K22, L20 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 2, 2011 ; Last revised: July 30, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.578 seconds