|
||||
|
||||
A Positive Agenda for Behavioral Law and EconomicsClaire A. HillUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law February 1, 2011 Cognitive Critique, Vol. 3, p. 85, 2011 Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-36 Abstract: Law has spent surprisingly little time developing a theory of human nature. Its efforts have largely focused on the abnormal - notably, those not responsible for their actions by reason of mental illness or diminished capacity. The normal has barely been addressed. Law and economics embeds a theory - that people are rational maximizers of their self-interest. Law and economics admits its theory is unrealistic; it touts instead its theory’s ability to predict. Behavioral law and economics aspires to more realism (and more predictive power). Its trajectory has, however, sometimes been contorted insofar as it has focused on exceptions to the law and economics view rather than a broader reconception of the overall endeavor. Such a reconception is desirable, necessary, and increasingly feasible.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6 Keywords: behavioral law and economics, identity, cultural cognition, empathy JEL Classification: D82, A11, K00 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 6, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds