The Myth of Discovery
Claire A. Hill
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - School of Law
Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 743, 2008
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-33
This review essay of Barry Schwartz’s Paradox of Choice discusses how Schwartz’s thesis that more choice is not always better should inform economists’ increasing acknowledgment that preferences are constructed, not fixed. In this companion piece to my more detailed consideration of the subject of constructed preferences, I argue that what makes the assumption of fixed preferences possible is a myth, the myth of discovery - that preferences exist to be discovered. Once we acknowledge that preferences are as much made as found, and that the raw materials from which they are made are scarcely stable, the assumption of fixed preferences becomes far less tenable. Schwartz’s account underscores that choosing isn’t just a simple process of discovery. When we choose, we do many other things as well: we may find out about ourselves, convey information to others, set ourselves up for good or bad feelings down the line and potentially, actions based thereon. In sum, a thorough cost/benefit calculation will not always favor more choice.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: preferences, rationality, choice
JEL Classification: A12, D83, D11Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 6, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.750 seconds