Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional?


Vikram D. Amar


University of California, Davis - School of Law

Akhil Amar


Yale Law School

1995

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, p. 113, November 1995
UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper

Abstract:     
In this essay, Akhil and Vikram Amar attack the constitutionality of the current presidential succession statute, which places the Speaker of the House and the Senate President pro tempore first and second in line, respectively, if there is neither a President nor a Vice President. Relying on the words of the Framers, the text and logic of the Constitution, and various practical and ethical concerns, the Amars conclude that federal legislators are not "Officers" under the Succession Clause and thus ineligible for the line of succession. Finally, the Amars suggest that an updated succession statute should provide for a prompt national election after succession, and should iron out various other wrinkles in the current succession statute.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: Constitution, succession, President

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 8, 2011 ; Last revised: October 13, 2011

Suggested Citation

Amar, Vikram D. and Amar, Akhil, Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional? (1995). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, p. 113, November 1995; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1923311

Contact Information

Vikram D. Amar (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
Akhil (Reed) Amar
Yale Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 300
Downloads: 24
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.296 seconds