Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional?
Vikram D. Amar
University of California, Davis - School of Law
Yale Law School
Stanford Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, p. 113, November 1995
UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper
In this essay, Akhil and Vikram Amar attack the constitutionality of the current presidential succession statute, which places the Speaker of the House and the Senate President pro tempore first and second in line, respectively, if there is neither a President nor a Vice President. Relying on the words of the Framers, the text and logic of the Constitution, and various practical and ethical concerns, the Amars conclude that federal legislators are not "Officers" under the Succession Clause and thus ineligible for the line of succession. Finally, the Amars suggest that an updated succession statute should provide for a prompt national election after succession, and should iron out various other wrinkles in the current succession statute.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: Constitution, succession, PresidentAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 8, 2011 ; Last revised: October 13, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.296 seconds