Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1923957
 


 



Objecting at the Altar: Why the Herring Good Faith Principle and the Harlow Qualified Immunity Doctrine Should Not Be Married


John Greabe


University of New Hampshire School of Law

September 7, 2011

Columbia Law Review Sidebar, Vol. 112, No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
Response to: Jennifer E. Laurin, Trawling for Herring: Lessons in Doctrinal Borrowing and Convergence, 111 Colum. L. Rev. 670 (2011)

Critics of the curtailment of the exclusionary rule worked by Herring v. United States have denounced the decision as Supreme Court activism posing as derivation from settled law. Professor Jennifer Laurin agrees that Herring breaks with exclusionary rule doctrine but disputes that it lacks any grounding in Court precedent. She says that Herring consummates a long courtship between the Leon good faith exception to the exclusionary rule and the Harlow standard for qualified immunity. Laurin premises her argument on an admittedly unorthodox depiction of qualified immunity that overstates the doctrine’s protective scope. Ironically, one effect of this overstatement could be to enable a doctrinal distortion of precisely the type Laurin cautions against. For by positing a substantive equivalence between Harlow rule and the significantly more protective Herring principle, Laurin invites judges to borrow from Herring to further restrict the availability of constitutional tort remedies. Part I of this response highlights some potential problems posed by Laurin’s heterodox characterization of the qualified immunity doctrine. Part II defends the conventional description of the doctrine as more accurate and normatively desirable. Part III shifts gears and amplifies Laurin’s warnings about the trans-substantive application of constitutional tort doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 8, 2011 ; Last revised: March 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Greabe, John, Objecting at the Altar: Why the Herring Good Faith Principle and the Harlow Qualified Immunity Doctrine Should Not Be Married (September 7, 2011). Columbia Law Review Sidebar, Vol. 112, No. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1923957

Contact Information

John Greabe (Contact Author)
University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
(603) 513-5191 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 174
Downloads: 27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds