Is Law a Parasite? An Evolutionary Explanation of Differences Among Legal Traditions
Jan M. Smits
Maastricht University Faculty of Law - Maastricht European Private Law Institute (M-EPLI); University of Helsinki - Center of Excellence in Foundations of European Law and Polity
September 9, 2011
Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 7, pp. 791-804, 2011
Maastricht European Private Law Institute Working Paper No. 2011/31
One of the most salient characteristics of law is that it can be seen as a tradition: law is passed on from one generation to another and, even though profound changes in the law may occur over time, its development is usually seen as a continuous one. Thus, in The Common Law, Oliver Wendell Holmes states that ‘the law embodies the story of a nation’s development through many centuries (...).’ Alan Watson also emphasizes the extraordinary persistence of rules by noting that similar rules have been transplanted from one society to another. This paper seeks to explain differences among legal traditions by applying a specific evolutionary framework. This framework is based on ‘symbiosism’, a Darwinian theory developed by linguists to explain the origins and development of language. The basis for this theory is that language is an organism residing in the human brain and therefore a memetic life form. In this respect, interesting parallels can be drawn between language and law. This theory can be used to help explain differences among jurisdictions, in particular why it is that these differences continue to exist over time.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: evolutionary analysis of law, memetics, comparative law
JEL Classification: K00working papers series
Date posted: September 9, 2011 ; Last revised: January 10, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds