Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1924489
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (240)



 


 



Acts of Emotion: Analyzing Congressional Involvement in the Federal Rules of Evidence


Michael Teter


University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law

September 8, 2011

Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2008

Abstract:     
When Congress intervenes in amending the Federal Rules of Evidence it displays the very characteristics that Rule 403 is designed to keep out of the courtroom. Indeed, the history surrounding enactment of Rules 413-415 (allowing prior bad act evidence in sexual crimes) and Rule 704(b) (restricting use of expert testimony on the mental state of the defendant) shows that Congress often succumbs to inflamed passions, emotional appeals, and faulty logic when considering evidentiary rules. However, unlike a jury‟s display of these traits, which reaches only to the single case before it, congressional interference in the Federal Rules of Evidence results in wide-ranging and long-term detriment to the fairness of America‟s system of justice. For these reasons, Congress should refrain from directly involving itself in the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 9, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Teter, Michael, Acts of Emotion: Analyzing Congressional Involvement in the Federal Rules of Evidence (September 8, 2011). Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1924489

Contact Information

Michael Teter (Contact Author)
University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East, Room 101
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 192
Downloads: 11
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  240

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.265 seconds