Abstract

 


 



The Paradoxical Evolution of Law


Ali Khan


Washburn University - School of Law

September 8, 2011

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
The paradoxical evolution of law authenticates durability and change. It mediates between the finite and the infinite. At a given point in time, law is a definitive corpus of rules and its constitutive norms can be identified and applied through specific legal methods. Despite its finitism, however, law accommodates a complex world imbued with absolute infinitism. Time, space, divinity, nature, causation, and consequences, all are infinite. As a general matter, human systems, including law, faced with infinitism manufactures finitism. In contracts, decedent’s estate, patents, searches and seizures, and other areas of law, law needs finite facts and finite rules to structure transactions and resolve disputes. Master texts, containing fundamental norms, protect the paradoxical evolution of law. They provide stability and durability. But they are also exposed to bi-dimensional mutations. First, the master text may undergo amendatory mutations. Second, the master text, even if non-amendable, is open to interpretative mutations. Living master texts, such as the U.S. Constitution, evolve and embrace bi-dimensional mutations. Law’s structured finitism, however, places methodological constraints on interpretative mutations and does not allow arbitrary and willful subversions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 10, 2011 ; Last revised: April 24, 2012

Suggested Citation

Khan, Ali, The Paradoxical Evolution of Law (September 8, 2011). Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1924496 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1924496

Contact Information

Ali Khan (Contact Author)
Washburn University - School of Law ( email )
1700 College Avenue
Topeka, KS 66621
United States
785-6701671 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 220
Downloads: 26

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds