|
||||
|
||||
The Method of Text and ?: Jack Balkin’s Originalism with No RegretsLarry AlexanderUniversity of San Diego School of Law September 8, 2011 University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 11-067 Abstract: In this comment on Jack Balkin’s Living Originalism, I analyze his method of “text and principle.” I have no quarrel with Balkin’s claim that some of the constitutional norms are rules and some are standards. However, his claim that some of the norms are “principles,” which principles do most of the work in his attempt to reconcile originalism and living constitutionalism, is the claim that I find doubtful. I examine three conceptions of what such principles might be, and I conclude that one of them is possible but highly unlikely, while the others are not merely unlikely but impossible of realization.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16 Keywords: originalism, rule, standard, principle, jurisprudence, constitutional interpretation JEL Classification: K10 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 9, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.391 seconds