The Method of Text and ?: Jack Balkin’s Originalism with No Regrets
University of San Diego School of Law
September 8, 2011
University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming
San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 11-067
In this comment on Jack Balkin’s Living Originalism, I analyze his method of “text and principle.” I have no quarrel with Balkin’s claim that some of the constitutional norms are rules and some are standards. However, his claim that some of the norms are “principles,” which principles do most of the work in his attempt to reconcile originalism and living constitutionalism, is the claim that I find doubtful. I examine three conceptions of what such principles might be, and I conclude that one of them is possible but highly unlikely, while the others are not merely unlikely but impossible of realization.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: originalism, rule, standard, principle, jurisprudence, constitutional interpretation
JEL Classification: K10Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 9, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds