Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1924925
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Are Debit Cards Really More Costly for Merchants? Assessing Retailers' Costs and Benefits of Payment Instrument Acceptance


Anne Layne-Farrar


Charles River Associates

September 9, 2011


Abstract:     
Payment cards have been a perennial source of debate among economists. That debate received additional fodder in 2011 with passage of the Durbin Amendment, which targets debit card interchange fees. I assess the claim that the merchant side of the debit card payment platform has paid more than its “fair share” for debit transactions. I find no evidence to support the view that debit cards are more costly for merchants to accept than other payment instruments, like cash or check. To the contrary, when relevant incremental costs and benefits are included, debit cards are most often one of the cheapest payment instruments for retailers to accept.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: Debit cards, Interchange fee, Dodd-Frank, Durbin Amendment

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 9, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Layne-Farrar, Anne, Are Debit Cards Really More Costly for Merchants? Assessing Retailers' Costs and Benefits of Payment Instrument Acceptance (September 9, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1924925 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1924925

Contact Information

Anne Layne-Farrar (Contact Author)
Charles River Associates ( email )
1 South Wacker Drive
Suite 3400
Chicago, IL 60606
United States
312-377-9238 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.crai.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 816
Downloads: 146
Download Rank: 120,513
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.516 seconds