Footnotes (316)



Visual Invention

Sarah Burstein

The University of Oklahoma College of Law

April 9, 2012

16 Lewis & Clark Law Review, 169 (2012)

Recently, there has been a renewed interest in design patents and, in particular, in the issue of nonobviousness. Courts and commentators have long struggled with how the nonobviousness requirement should be applied to designs. This Article argues that the Federal Circuit’s current test for design patent nonobviousness is flawed and proposes several changes to that test. The approach proposed here will provide much-needed clarity in an unusually murky area of law and will also better promote the relevant policy goals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: Intellectual property, design patents, industrial design

Download This Paper

Date posted: September 12, 2011 ; Last revised: June 5, 2012

Suggested Citation

Burstein, Sarah, Visual Invention (April 9, 2012). 16 Lewis & Clark Law Review, 169 (2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926162

Contact Information

Sarah Burstein (Contact Author)
The University of Oklahoma College of Law ( email )
300 Timberdell Road
Norman, OK 73019
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ou.edu/content/burstein-sarah
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,734
Downloads: 179
Download Rank: 105,159
Footnotes:  316

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds