Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926162
 
 

Footnotes (316)



 


 



Visual Invention


Sarah Burstein


The University of Oklahoma College of Law

April 9, 2012

16 Lewis & Clark Law Review, 169 (2012)

Abstract:     
Recently, there has been a renewed interest in design patents and, in particular, in the issue of nonobviousness. Courts and commentators have long struggled with how the nonobviousness requirement should be applied to designs. This Article argues that the Federal Circuit’s current test for design patent nonobviousness is flawed and proposes several changes to that test. The approach proposed here will provide much-needed clarity in an unusually murky area of law and will also better promote the relevant policy goals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: Intellectual property, design patents, industrial design

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 12, 2011 ; Last revised: June 5, 2012

Suggested Citation

Burstein, Sarah, Visual Invention (April 9, 2012). 16 Lewis & Clark Law Review, 169 (2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926162

Contact Information

Sarah Burstein (Contact Author)
The University of Oklahoma College of Law ( email )
300 Timberdell Road
Norman, OK 73019
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ou.edu/content/burstein-sarah
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,578
Downloads: 161
Download Rank: 109,370
Footnotes:  316

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.375 seconds