Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (43)



 


 



Access to Essential Facilities: A Comparative Competition Law Perspective of Shared Use and Recent Margin Squeeze Cases


Anca Daniela Chirita


Durham University - Department of Law

September 12, 2011

Competition Survey: Studies, Researches and Analysis, Vol. 1, pp. 32-41, 2011

Abstract:     
This contribution aims to present a brief legal background of access to essential facilities under European, Romanian, and German competition law and comparatively key issues in dealing with facilities cases. It also highlights the most recent developments in the Scadlines case, particularly the exceptional circumstances of granting access, and explains the practical difficulties in order to agree on the setting of an '"adequate remuneration." The contribution concludes with some recent examples of margin squeeze under EU and German competition law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: margin squeeze cases, essential facilities, EU competition law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 12, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Chirita, Anca Daniela, Access to Essential Facilities: A Comparative Competition Law Perspective of Shared Use and Recent Margin Squeeze Cases (September 12, 2011). Competition Survey: Studies, Researches and Analysis, Vol. 1, pp. 32-41, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926279

Contact Information

Anca Daniela Chirita (Contact Author)
Durham University - Department of Law ( email )
Stockton Road
The Palatine Centre
Durham, County Durham DH1 3LE
United Kingdom
00441913342860 (Phone)
0044191 33 42801 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.dur.ac.uk/law/staff/stafflist/?id=9664
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 393
Downloads: 141
Download Rank: 103,176
Footnotes:  43

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds