Improving Health Care Outcomes Through Personalized Comparisons of Treatment Effectiveness Based on Electronic Health Records
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Case Western Reserve University
September 12, 2011
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 39, No. 3, p. 425
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-24
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is one of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s significant initiatives that aims to improve treatment outcomes and lower health care costs. This Article takes CER a step further and suggests a novel clinical application for it. The Article proposes the development of a national framework to enable physicians to rapidly perform, through a computerized service, medically sound personalized comparisons of the effectiveness of possible treatments for patients’ conditions. A treatment comparison for a given patient would be based on data from electronic health records of a cohort of clinically similar patients who received the treatments previously and whose outcomes were recorded. This framework has unique potential to simultaneously improve the quality of health care, reduce its cost, and alleviate public concerns about rationing and “one size fits all” medicine.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: Electronic health records, Comparative effectiveness research, Health care outcomes, Health care innovations, Health care costs, Personalized comparison of treatment effectiveness, Personalized medicine, Medical informatics, Medical data integrity
JEL Classification: I18, K23, K32
Date posted: September 13, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds