Comment: Sit-Ins and State Action - Mr. Justice Douglas, Concurring
William W. Van Alstyne
William & Mary Law School
Kenneth L. Karst
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
Stanford Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 762, 1962
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-125
This analysis of Mr. Justice Douglas’ concurrence in Garner v. Louisiana pays special attention to the lip service Justice Douglas pays to the state action requirement while never fully addressing such an issue.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: state actionAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 15, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.797 seconds