Abstract

  


 



Comment: Sit-Ins and State Action - Mr. Justice Douglas, Concurring


William W. Van Alstyne


William & Mary Law School

Kenneth L. Karst


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
1962

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 762, 1962
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-125

Abstract:     
This analysis of Mr. Justice Douglas’ concurrence in Garner v. Louisiana pays special attention to the lip service Justice Douglas pays to the state action requirement while never fully addressing such an issue.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: state action

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 15, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Van Alstyne, William W. and Karst, Kenneth L., Comment: Sit-Ins and State Action - Mr. Justice Douglas, Concurring (1962). Stanford Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 762, 1962; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-125. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1927496

Contact Information

William W. Van Alstyne (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Kenneth L. Karst
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 169
Downloads: 6

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds