HIV, Consent and Criminal Wrongs
University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law (Common Law)
University of Saskatchewan - College of Law
September 15, 2011
Criminal Law Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 4, p. 464, 2011
Over a decade has elapsed since, in R. v. Cuerrier, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that those who knowingly fail to disclose HIV positive status to their sexual partners are criminally culpable. Since then, the use of the criminal law in these circumstances has been criticized. It is suggested, in particular, that advances in the treatment of HIV-AIDS render several of Cuerrier’s key premises tenuous and in need of reconsideration. The Supreme Court has created an opportunity for such reconsideration in two appeals: R. v Mabior and R. v. DC. In this article we suggest that the Court should reconsider Cuerrier in a fundamentally different way, engaging more squarely with the boundaries of sexual assault. We believe that much of the criticism of Cuerrier, while thoughtful and important, proceeds from questionable premises of criminal responsibility that carry serious implications for the concept of consent to sexual activity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: criminal law, sexual assault, HIV-AIDS, consentAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 18, 2012 ; Last revised: February 5, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.625 seconds