|
||||
|
||||
Presidential Approval Models Revisited: A New PerspectiveBetul DicleLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Department of Political Science Mehmet F. DicleLoyola University New Orleans - Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of Business September 15, 2011 Abstract: Use of quarterly economic data in presidential job approval models implies that polls are reactions, in part, to quarterly economic performance. Perhaps this implication is not intended but it is due to the availability of low frequency economic data. We argue that voters have a shorter reaction time and do not wait for periodic data while the economy is in motion. We suggest the use of high frequency financial variables that proxy past, present and expected economic performance. Since opinions are formed based on continuous information, we also suggest employing Geweke type instantaneous feedback as well as traditional Granger type sequential causal feedback. The results show that for presidential candidates, weekly financial risk may be just as important as quarterly GDP growth or monthly unemployment.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23 Keywords: Presidential job approval, economic performance, financial markets, financial risk, instantaneous feedback JEL Classification: D72, P16 working papers seriesDate posted: September 16, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.453 seconds