Mr. Justice Black, Constitutional Review and the Talisman of State Action
William W. Van Alstyne
William & Mary Law School
Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1965, p. 219, 1965
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-132
In an endorsement of Justice Black’s dissent in Bell v. Maryland, this work argues in favors of Black’s interpretation of the state action requirement and attempts to make sense of Black’s understanding in other cases where he found state action in similar private circumstances.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: state action requirement, private actorAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 17, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.640 seconds