An Empirical Study of Public Defender Effectiveness: Self-Selection by the 'Marginally Indigent'

Abstract:     
An econometric study of all felony cases filed in Denver, Colorado, in 2002, shows that public defenders achieved poorer outcomes than their privately retained counterparts, measured by the actual sentences defendants received. But this study suggests that the traditional explanation for this difference - underfunding resulting in overburdened public defenders - may not tell the whole story. The authors discovered a large segment of what they call “marginally indigent” defendants, who appear capable of hiring private counsel if the charges against them are sufficiently serious. These results suggest that at least one explanation for poor public defender outcomes may be that public defender clients, by self-selection, tend to have less defensible cases. If marginally indigent defendants can find the money to hire private counsel when the charges are sufficiently serious, perhaps they can also find the money when they are innocent, or think they have a strong case.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: attorney effectiveness, public defender, private attorney, indigent defendants

JEL Classification: K0, K14, K40

Accepted Paper Series