Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1928919
 
 

Footnotes (305)



 


 



Social and Legal Debate About the Affordable Care Act


Janet L. Dolgin


Hofstra University - School of Law

Katherine Rouse Dieterich


Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law

September 16, 2011

University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 1, 2011
Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-20

Abstract:     
This article reviews and analyzes the sweeping 2010 health care reform bill (the 'Affordable Care Act'). It describes the Act’s central provisions, reviews legal challenges to the Act, and examines the social, cultural, and economic roots of the widespread and intense opposition to the Act among the public, a year after the Act’s promulgation.

Efforts to invalidate, repeal or limit the Affordable Care Act have moved forward in courts, Congress, and state legislatures. Politicians and lawyers opposing the Act have delineated a set of presumptive problems with it – that, for instance, Congress lacked authority to provide for the Act’s central provisions (e.g., the so-called 'individual mandate'), that implementing the Act will increase the nation’s deficit, and that the Act fundamentally limits freedom and choice. The Article reviews each claim and examines it in light of the nation’s long-standing reluctance to reform its health care system. It then examines the socio-cultural assumptions that have undergirded the nation’s refusal for almost a century to affect universal or near-universal health care coverage. In that failure the United States differs from virtually each other wealthy nation. Even more, the United States has long spent more for health care per capita than any other nation, and yet has a higher rate of infant mortality and a lower life expectancy than most industrialized nations. The article examines that history and suggests that the same assumptions that have long precluded significant reform of the nation’s health care system now encourage opposition to the Affordable Care Act.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: affordable care act, health care reform, individual mandate

JEL Classification: I10, I18, I28, I30, D60

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 17, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Dolgin, Janet L. and Dieterich, Katherine Rouse, Social and Legal Debate About the Affordable Care Act (September 16, 2011). University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 1, 2011; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1928919

Contact Information

Janet L. Dolgin (Contact Author)
Hofstra University - School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States

Hofstra University Logo

Katherine Rouse Dieterich
Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 823
Downloads: 204
Download Rank: 85,201
Footnotes:  305

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.734 seconds